Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01892
Original file (PD 2012 01892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                 CASE: PD-2012-01892
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY           BOARD DATE: 20140409
SEPARATION DATE: 20030411


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Petty Officer Third Class/E-4 (EM4/Electrician’s Mate) medically separated for a left ankle condition. He was treated, but his ankle condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. In October 2001, he underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The left ankle condition was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The PEB found the left ankle condition unfitting, rated 10%. The CI requested retention on permanent limited duty (LIMDU) until his term of service expired. This was approved, and a second PEB was convened in October 2002. The left ankle condition was once again found unfitting and rated at 10%. He was medically separated in April 2003 with a 10% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “I believe the rating was inaccurate for my ankle because it took them approximately 8 months after the incident to do surgery because they thought it was a high ankle sprain only, which caused my ankle to get worse. I was on a cane for two years after surgery and still to this day it cause problems in my daily life. They never rated me for my knees, finger, sinuses and back which prevented me from continuing serving on a ship. My command wanted me to do a cross rate and did the paper work in order for me to stay in the Navy and do shore duty, it was denied Medical board because of sea duty obligations also I didn't get a chance to go in front of them appeal because the people who was handling my case wasn't giving me good information so I was Medical Board out in Japan and was sent to San Diego to process out.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left ankle condition is addressed below. The requested knees, finger, sinuses and back conditions were not identified by the MEB/PEB and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. No other conditions are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Navy PEB – dated 20021021
 VA – (Based on Service Treatment Record)*
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Ankle Condition 5010-5003 10% Left Ankle Condition 5010-5271 10% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 8 STR
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 40%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20031006 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

Left Ankle Condition. In August 2000, the CI was injured while playing soccer. He was diagnosed with a left ankle sprain. He received treatment for the injury, including surgical repair and two periods of LIMDU. However, his left ankle pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary was dictated on 26 October 2001. At that time, he was in no acute distress, but he walked with a slight limp. Physical exam (PE) of the left ankle revealed a negative anterior drawer sign. Neurovascular status was intact and X-rays showed symmetric joint space. Range-of-motion (ROM) was measured and is summarized in the chart below. The CI was medically separated in April 2003 and was scheduled for a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 5 June 2003, but he failed to appear for that evaluation. He did have a C&P exam in May 2004, more than 12 months after separation. At that time, his gait was normal. PE of the left ankle revealed tenderness in the region of the anterior talofibular ligament. The ankle however, was stable with a negative anterior drawer and a negative lateral tilt test. The ROM evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation are summarized in the chart below.

Left Ankle ROM
(Degrees)		 NARSUM ~ 18 mos . Pre-Sep
(20011026)
 VA C&P ~ 1 2½ mos . Post-Sep
(20040501)
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 10 10
Plantar Flexion (45) 35 30
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 %

The Board carefully reviewed all available evidence and directs attention to its rating recommendation. The Navy PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the left ankle condition, but both assigned a disability rating of 10%. Based on the evidence in the treatment record, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board determined that the CI’s limitation of ankle motion was best described as “moderate.” The record did not show sufficient evidence to characterize his limited ankle motion as “marked.” After due deliberation, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% for the left ankle was warranted. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating using other codes which could be applied to the ankle condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 201201892, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 15 Dec 14

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC



                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                           (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00643

    Original file (PD2013 00643.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic left ankle tendonitis as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Left Ankle Pain Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00615

    Original file (PD2012-00615.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), who found the right ankle instability unfitting and rated it 0%. this injury is permanent as listed in the findings of the Physical Evaluation Board which I have enclosed.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00382

    Original file (PD-2012-00382.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Left Knee Pain. The Board concluded therefore that no separate disability rating could be recommended for this condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING 5262 COMBINED 20% 20% Chronic Left Knee and Ankle Pain The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20050218, w/atchs Exhibit B.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01459

    Original file (PD-2013-01459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “left knee pain status post patellar dislocation,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain…5099-500310%Left Knee Strain5299-525710%20050118Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 020050118 Combined: 10%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050513(most proximate to date of separation) Chronic Left Knee Pain Status Post Patellar...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02554

    Original file (PD-2013-02554.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “The PEB rated me 20% disabled while the VA rated 30%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00722

    Original file (PD-2012-00722.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA exam noted painful right ankle ROM, as listed above. The VA rated the left and right ankle conditions separately as follows; coded 5271 painful limitation of ROM at 10% each for an overall rating of 20%. In the matter of the chronic bilateral ankle pain, due to right talar OCD lesion and left ankle chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle chondromalacia condition coded 5014‐5271 and rated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01364

    Original file (PD-2013-01364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated left knee ACL deficiency surgically treated as unfitting, rated at 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). I am in pain all the time, and additional surgery has been recommended. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00678

    Original file (PD-2012-00678.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic right lower extremity pain as requested for consideration meets the Chronic Right Lower Extremity Pain 5299‐5262 20% ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 20% Condition Status Post Right Distal Tibia and Fibula Fracture Medial Right Leg Scar Lateral Right Leg Scar Right Ankle Scars Left Hip Iliotibial Band Syndrome Code 5262 8627‐7804 7804 7804 5099‐5024 Combined: 20% Rating 0%* 10% 0% 0% 10% Exam 20030414 20030414 20030414 20030414 20030414 criteria prescribed in DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00714

    Original file (PD2011-00714.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right anterior ankle impingement condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Right Anterior Ankle Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING 5262 COMBINED 20% 20% Right Anterior Ankle Impingement The following...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01396

    Original file (PD2012 01396.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated the left ankle pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the left ankle pain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policyby the Board.In the matter of the left ankle pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a...